What methods are commonly used for application assessment?

The correct choice highlights the methods commonly employed for application assessment, which include surveys, interviews, metrics analysis, and performance audits. Each of these methods plays a critical role in gathering comprehensive insights about applications.

Surveys are an effective tool for collecting quantitative data from a large number of users or stakeholders, providing a broad view of opinions and experiences regarding the application. Interviews complement this by offering qualitative insights, allowing for deeper exploration of user experiences and specific challenges.

Metrics analysis involves evaluating performance data such as user engagement statistics, load times, and error rates. This objective data is crucial for understanding how well an application performs against expected outcomes. Performance audits further support this assessment by reviewing various aspects of an application's functionality and usability, helping identify areas for improvement.

In contrast, the other options present methods that may be useful in different contexts but do not specifically align with direct application assessment processes. For instance, while workshops and focus groups (as mentioned in another option) can foster discussion, they may not yield the structured data needed for thorough evaluations. Additionally, case studies and competition analysis serve different purposes such as strategic insight rather than focused assessments of specific applications.